Difference between revisions of "Talk:Future Stock"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
According to Hermes, the stock is "worth less now [at .03$] than when it was worthless". Zoidberg had 51% of all shares, more than 100.001. At 3 cents per share, that means he had more than 3000$ which Hermes just gave away as toilet paper. It doesn't seem like Hermes to lose track of how much money he's actually giving out. --[[Special:Contributions/77.11.70.161|77.11.70.161]] 22:38, 8 July 2011 (CEST) | According to Hermes, the stock is "worth less now [at .03$] than when it was worthless". Zoidberg had 51% of all shares, more than 100.001. At 3 cents per share, that means he had more than 3000$ which Hermes just gave away as toilet paper. It doesn't seem like Hermes to lose track of how much money he's actually giving out. --[[Special:Contributions/77.11.70.161|77.11.70.161]] 22:38, 8 July 2011 (CEST) | ||
:By "100.001", do you mean "100001"? In such case, you're right. Sounds like a goof. - [[User:Aki|aki]]<sup>[[User talk:Aki|talk]]</sup> 23:44, 8 July 2011 (CEST) | :By "100.001", do you mean "100001"? In such case, you're right. Sounds like a goof. - [[User:Aki|aki]]<sup>[[User talk:Aki|talk]]</sup> 23:44, 8 July 2011 (CEST) | ||
::Ack, stupid german reflexes...we do , and . all backwards >.< I'll add it to goofs. (yes, I'm the same IP as above, too lazy to register) --[[Special:Contributions/93.129.204.15|93.129.204.15]] 23:28, 25 July 2011 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 23:28, 25 July 2011
Future Stock appeared on the Infosphere's Main Page as the featured article for August, 2008. This article (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best produced by the Infosphere community. If you can update or improve it, please do. |
I'm not sure if I made a mistake somewhere (or if this is too much nerdrage for the poor trivia section), so I'll post this here before i put it in the article:
According to Hermes, the stock is "worth less now [at .03$] than when it was worthless". Zoidberg had 51% of all shares, more than 100.001. At 3 cents per share, that means he had more than 3000$ which Hermes just gave away as toilet paper. It doesn't seem like Hermes to lose track of how much money he's actually giving out. --77.11.70.161 22:38, 8 July 2011 (CEST)
- By "100.001", do you mean "100001"? In such case, you're right. Sounds like a goof. - akitalk 23:44, 8 July 2011 (CEST)
- Ack, stupid german reflexes...we do , and . all backwards >.< I'll add it to goofs. (yes, I'm the same IP as above, too lazy to register) --93.129.204.15 23:28, 25 July 2011 (CEST)